All of these individual defendants appeared specially and moved, pursuant to section 410.30 and 418.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to quash the service of the summons and complaint on them and, in the alternative, to have the court dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum.Įxxon conceded jurisdiction but moved for dismissal on the ground of inconvenient forum. ("Esso"), and the directors and officers of Exxon who allegedly authorized and paid a $14.2 million ransom for Victor Samuelson, a corporate executive, kidnaped by Argentine terrorists.Īll directors who were on the board of Exxon at the time the payment was authorized and made, and the secretary of the corporation, were named and served as defendants. This is a shareholders' derivative action brought by two shareholders of Exxon Corporation ("Exxon") against Exxon and its wholly owned subsidiary, Esso (Argentina), Inc. Zuckerman for Defendants and Respondents. Lindemann, Jr., McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, William W. Van Tassell for Plaintiffs and Appellants.ĭowney, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, John F. Tune, Van Tassell, Sullivan & Van Tassell and Vance J. J., concurring.)Īsmundson & Tune, Vigfus A. EXXON CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents FLICK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |